1) The extraordinary evidence of the creativity humanizes
2) The uncertainty that this produces on the future
3) The extraordinary capacity of the children. The capacity of innovation
The exhibition of Sir Ken Robinson centres on this capacity of the children and on how we have wasted it across the educational current system. First he indicates that the creativity must have the same importance that the literacy since, if the children lack fear of being wrong this it makes them come to original results.
The educational systems prepare the people with the idea of that a mistake can be the worst thing that can happen and as result to remove the people of their creative capacity; there are taught they out of this capacity because there is prioritized what is taught stopping in last place to the arts. In addition it has been as intention creates university teachers.
This has a reason: the educational system is based on the idea of academic capacity, one removes the people what him pleases with the argument of “you will never obtain work doing it … " and the whole system is based on this capacity enclosedly the same university. And since we all are plunged in a long process to the university you present with talent (and stigmatized with the previous argument) they think that they cannot come to it. Therefore we have to rethink as we see to the intelligence and how we are educating our children valuing their creativity and making ourselves responsible for that they will see the future and we not.
Hi Jordi, How are you?? I hope fine. I agree with you when you say that the Education of our children has to be an important topic od discussion. Good bye!!
ReplyDeleteYOUR POST IS VERY INTERENTING, YOU HAVE ALMOST ALL THE IMPORTANT. I LIKE IT.
ReplyDeleteThere are three topics treated in the conference:
ReplyDelete1) The extraordinary evidence *that* creativity humanizes
2) The uncertainty that this produces on the future
3) The extraordinary capacity of (the) children. The ?M capacity of innovation
The exhibition of Sir Ken Robinson centres on this capacity of the children and on how we have wasted it across the educational current WO system. First he indicates that (the) creativity must have the same importance that WW (the) literacy since, P if (the) children lack fear of being wrong this (it) makes them come to WE original results.
The educational systems prepare (the) people with the idea (of) that a mistake can be the worst thing that can happen ?M and as result to remove the people of their creative capacity; there are taught they ?M out of this capacity because *the prioritization of* what is taught *puts the arts in last place*. In addition it has been as intention creates university teachers. ?M
This has a reason: the educational system is based on the idea of academic capacity:* one removes *what pleases people from them* with the argument of “you will never obtain work doing it … " and the whole system is based on this capacity enclosedly WW the same university. And since we all are plunged in a long process *of education in* the university you present with talent (and stigmatized with the previous argument) they think that they cannot come to it. Therefore we have to rethink *how* we see (to the) intelligence and how we are educating our children valuing their creativity and making ourselves responsible for that they will see the future and we not.