Indeed I don't have very clear which would be, specifically, my ideal work; nevertheless I would like to be employed at any organism of the state, but that has relation with the international area or with the social area. In both areas I need to take qualities as good diction, excellent capacity of empathy, be a good leader and, finally, to be responsible and systematic.

The skills that I should have, my career is going to deliver them me and it are the efficiency and efficacy, the knowledge of the public, law , economy, history, public management, management, human resources, interpersonal relations, etc. and like out-standing I have to know several languages.

I believe that this type of work would accommodate enough good since the qualities before mentioned already I have them and only I have to improve them and am learning the skills little by little, in addition I like very much the fact of relating to people of other places or of other social strata and always to look for the way of helping or ending with the conflicts giving solutions.

The only problem is to find or to manage to be employed at this class of employment since one earns the places of ascent itself by means of the time that rides working, that is to say enough time will pass until I could fulfill my dream …

"To open the bucket and to find the life" Roberto Matta

This piece of art was done for Roberto Sebastián Antonio Matta Echaurren, more known as Matta (*Santiago of Chile, on November 11, 1911 - + Civitavecchia, Italy, on November 23, 2002). He was an architect, painter, philosopher and Chilean poet. He is considered the last one of the representatives of the surrealism in the world.
This piece the art I saw it for the first time today at 11:30 am when I was looking for some piece of art for my post and I liked much because Matta's art is produced in the creation of signs and an original visually. “To open the bucket and to find the life” it is a piece where the individual gestuality of the painter does to himself present first in the anthropomorphous format, which means the exit of the picture and then in the systematic relation of all the present elements that are organized as universe.

Do schools kill creativity?

There are three topics treated in the conference:
1) The extraordinary evidence of the creativity humanizes
2) The uncertainty that this produces on the future
3) The extraordinary capacity of the children. The capacity of innovation

The exhibition of Sir Ken Robinson centres on this capacity of the children and on how we have wasted it across the educational current system. First he indicates that the creativity must have the same importance that the literacy since, if the children lack fear of being wrong this it makes them come to original results.

The educational systems prepare the people with the idea of that a mistake can be the worst thing that can happen and as result to remove the people of their creative capacity; there are taught they out of this capacity because there is prioritized what is taught stopping in last place to the arts. In addition it has been as intention creates university teachers.

This has a reason: the educational system is based on the idea of academic capacity, one removes the people what him pleases with the argument of “you will never obtain work doing it … " and the whole system is based on this capacity enclosedly the same university. And since we all are plunged in a long process to the university you present with talent (and stigmatized with the previous argument) they think that they cannot come to it. Therefore we have to rethink as we see to the intelligence and how we are educating our children valuing their creativity and making ourselves responsible for that they will see the future and we not.